Alliance
of Rockville
Citizens
- Officers:
President: Stan Klein
- Treasurer: Jim Gilchrist
ARC NEWSLETTER October 2009
VOTE on November 3, 2009
ELECTION
ROUNDUP editor: Roald Schrack
Topics:
1.)
The Candidates
2.) The Drop Outs
3.)
The Sad Last Days of the
Current Mayor and Council
4.)
Protecting Neighborhoods
1.) The Candidates There
are 2 candidates for Mayor, the incumbent, Susan Hoffmann,
and
Phyllis Marcuccio who has two terms of experience on the Council. Two
years ago there were three candidates. Mark Pierzchala, Drew Powell
and Susan Hoffmann. Mark decided to run for Council this
year.
Drew Powell is not a candidate this year but he now regularly appears
as a gadfly at Citizens Forum. Susan Hoffmann and Phyllis
Marcuccio have generally been at odds at meetings of the Mayor and
Council so it is no surprise that they contend for the top spot.
There are three good ways to learn more about the
Mayoral candidates.
Go to their websites:
www.susanhoffmann.com and phyllis4mayor.net
Watch their four minute videos on the
city website www.rockvillemd.gov
Go to , or watch one of the three
forums that will appear on Rocville Channel 11 on cable.
they will occur at 7:00 pm on
Thursday, Oct
8 , hosted by the West End Citizens Assn. at the Rockville Senior
Center, 1150 Carnation Dr.
Tuesday, Oct
13, Chamber of Commerce at Legacy Hotel and Conference Center,
1775 Rockville Pike
Tuesday, Oct 20, Twinbrook Citizens
Assn. at Twinbrook Recreation Center, 12920
Twinbrook
Parkway
The city will announce on their web page when the forums will
be replayed on channel 11.
There are 10 candidates for Council. Two years ago
there
were 11. Two of the 10 are the incumbents Peter Gajewski
(www.votegajewski.com) and John Britton
(www.rockvillemd.gov/government/mc/britton.html). Their records on the
Council
are relatively non-controversial and they should be easily re-elected.
There are two vacancies, one caused by Phyllis Marcuccio leaving to run
for Mayor and one by the voluntary retirement of Anne Robbins. She has
served 10 years on the Council and has said that she feels that is long
enough. Thus, we have 8 non-incumbents running for one of 2
seats. Not very good odds for the non-incumbent. It would be better for
the non-incumbents if there were fewer vying for the two readily
available seats.
The non-incumbent Council candidates are ( in alphbetical order) :
Max van Balgooy -
Pres. of Rockville
Historic Distric Commission. see his website: maxforrockville.
wordpress.com
Carl Henn - Pres
Hungerford Citizens Assn. Lost in 2007 by 113 votes to
Phyllis Marcuccio in 2007. website: carlhenn.googlepages.com
Trapper Martin -
restrauteur in Rockville. website: trappermartin.com
Tom Moore -
lawyer, Chair of
Compensation Commission, campaign activist since 1999, website:
moore4rockville.com
Bridget Newton - Past
President of West End Civic Assn. website:
www.bridgetnewton4citycouncil.com
Virginia Onley - Past chair
of Rockville
Compensation no website, her email is:
dareonley@yahoo.com
Waleed Ovase -
student at Richard
Montgomery High School, his wedsite: www.waleed4council.org
Mark Pierzchala -
Past President of
College Gardens Citizens Assn, Past Chair of Town Center Action Team.
website: www.votepierzchala. org
2.)
The Drop Outs
In addition to the eight candidates who finally decided to run, there
were some who had earlier indicated an interest but then did not run
for Council.
Frank Anastasi
Theo Anderson
W. Thomas Curtis
Joe Jordan
Jose Linan
3.)
Sad The
September 21 , 2009 meeting of the Mayor and Council
epitomized
the past two years experience with this M&C. The Citizen's
Forum
was largely taken up by a plea from the restauranteurs of Town Center
to delay the onsett of regular parking fees that had been scheduled
for October 4 . It seems that a big coordinated advertising
campaign has been arranged for "Restaurant Week in Rockville" starting
on October 5. The restauranteurs felt that the success of
their
campaign would be seriously hurt by the need for their customers to pay
for parking. The Mayor said they would take up a solution
under
New Business later in the evening. When it came time for New
Business John Britton made a motion to delay the imposition of paying
for parking ( after 7:00 pm) for one week to avoid being
coincident with "Restaurant Week". The motion failed for want of a
second ( the Mayor cannot introduce a motion or second it
according to Robert's Rules of Order ) Marcuccio,
Gajewski,
and Robbins gave various reasons for objecting to the motion.
The
Mayor said she had mentioned the motion to Marcuccio earlier in the day
and thought she had agreement. Marcuccio denied agreeing to the concept
of a one week delay and there it sat with no action taken to
soften the blow of parking fees on "Restaurant Week".
Everyone on the M&C knows that the survival of the
Town
Center restaurants is vital to the success of Town Center but
the M&C fear that citizens would see any compromise on the
parking
fees as a further burden on the taxpayers. It is estimated that the
additional parking fees earned from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm would bring in
$400,000 a year. Delaying the fee for one week would only
cost
about $8000 and could be absorbed by the city.But the problem remains
after the week is over. The restauranteurs would return after the week
and again ask for continuing relief from parking fees. The City is
between a rock and a hard place. It isn't just $400,000, There is an
additional $2,400,000 that the city must trim from the budget because
of the recession's impact on state revenues. Why anyone would want to
run for M&C in this environment is hard to see. The next two
years
are going to be very difficult for the city.
The miracle of modern technology permits you, at your leisure, to watch
the Sept. 21 M&C meeting on your computer at home "on
demand"
.
On the city website go to the M&C area and click on
"New!
Watch Meeting Videos Online" . Then choose the Sept 21 meeting. The
whole meeting is 3 hours and 43 minutes long but you can skip
over the dull parts by using fast forward or pulling the cusor forward
on the video display. The sad part is at the very end.
4.) Protecting
Neighborhoods - ( Not in My Backyard).
It started off with the attempt to stop
the construction of the new courthouse, jumped to Beall's Grant II , and now has
its focus on Victory Housing. It will be
interesting to see how all the dire predictions made for the impact of
the courthouse will really work out. Then came the threat of the
wrong kind of people that Beall's Grant II would bring to
that
neighborhood. Finally a retirement community for elderly low
income people is seen as a threat to housing values in its
area. Organized groups of irate homeowners have crowded
hearings before the Planning Commission, The Board of Appeals, and The
Mayor and Council this past year. Rockville is to be commended for its
support of democracy in action, but all too often the emotions are
based on misinformation and unsubstantuated fears.
The
expansion of Beall's Grant is now on hold because the
recession has reduced the state funds that were needed to
help finance the construction . It is not clear
whether the opposition to the construction of Beall's Grant has
been satisfied with the
modifications that have been made by Montgomery Housing Partnership.
When the state funds again
become available, the Mayor and Council will have to write a
letter of support for the project. The next Mayor and Council
will have to deal with whatever opposition
still exits at that time.
Victory Court is the name of the affordable retirement
community to be built in the wooded area behind the historic homes on
fleet street. The property is owned by the
county. The builder
will be Victory Housing, the non-profit development
arm
of the Archdiocese of Washington. They have built many other affordable
housing developments in the Washington area . They have a solid
reputation for management of the units they produce.
Rockville
desperately needs affordable units for seniors. Ingleside at King Farm,
a retirement facility,
has recently been completed, but the prices are beyondthe reach of the
majority of Rockville residents. The plans for Victory Court have been
approved by the Planning Commission and are now before the Board of
Appeals. It has
attracted opposition from many of the same people that also opposed
Beall's Grant II and the Courthouse. Information on the
application can be obtained at
www.rockvillemd.gov/government/commissions/boa/2009/0809.htm The Board
of Appeals will finish consideration of the appeal on November 7, 2009
A question arises as to the motivation for all the opposition to new
construction of non-residential projects. One
possible
cause is the fragile position that many homeowners find
themselves at present. The value of homes rose by more than a factor of
two from 2000 to 2006 and is now headed downhill. Many homeowners feel
threatened by the current decline in market values. Any perceived
threat to the value of their home will cause anxiety.
The opposition to the above projects comes from an area where
the assessed values will be revised downward by the state this coming
January. The
gravy train for homeowners and the city of constantly rising home
values is at an end. It is unfortunate but it must be expected that the
current levels of opposition to non-residential projects will continue
until homeowners once again feel comfortable about their financial
security.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------